In what I think is a very stupid and questionable decision, bookseller Barnes and Noble has decided they will not sell O. J. Simpson’s “fictionalized” account of how his wife was killed. Why do I think this is a stupid decision on the part of B&N? Because when booksellers start making decisions about what they will or will not sell based on content it becomes a slippery slop towards censorship; and no, I do not believe their lame excuse of no maket for the book. As disgusting as this book might be, market is there for it. In the end, that’s a decision for the cosumer, not B&N — or any bookseller.
If they won’t sell Simpson’s book because there isn’t a market for it, why does B&N stock The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion? It’s a shining example of racist propaganda, for more damaging than anything Simpson has to say, but B&N sees no issue with selling that book. Hypocrites!
In it’s own listing for Protocols, Amazon.com states,
“Should Amazon.com sell The Protocols and other controversial works? As a bookseller, Amazon.com strongly believes that providing open access to written speech, no matter how hateful or ugly, is one of the most important things we do. It’s a service that the United States Constitution protects, and one that follows a long tradition of booksellers serving as guardians of free expression in our society.
<snip>
Nevertheless, Amazon.com believes it is censorship not to sell certain books because we believe their message repugnant, and we would be rightly criticized if we did so. Therefore, we will continue to make this book and other controversial works available in the United States and everywhere else, except where they are prohibited by law.
Furthermore, because we strongly believe that the appropriate response to repugnant speech is not censorship, but more speech, we will continue to allow readers, authors, and publishers to express their views about the books and other products we offer on our Web site.”
That is how you deal with something like Simpson’s book.